Monday, September 14, 2009
Introduction to Foreign Exchange Markets
In the early days, the system of currency exchange is supported solely by the gold amount held in the vault of a country. However, this system is no longer appropriate now due to inflation and hence, the value of one’s currency nowadays is determined through the market forces alone. In order to determine the value of a currency’s exchange rate, two main types of system is used which is floating currency and pegged currency.
For floating exchange rate, its value is determined by the supply and demand of the global market where the supply and demand is bound by all these factors such as foreign investment, inflation and ratios of import and export. Normally, this system is adopted by most of the advance countries like for example UK, US and Canada. All of these countries have a similarity where their market is well developed and stable in economic terms. These countries choose to practice this system due to the reason where floating exchange rate is proven to be much more efficient compared to the pegged exchange rate. The reason behind this is because for floating exchange rate, the market itself will re-adjust the exchange rate real-time in order to portray the actual inflation and other economic forces. However, every system has its own flaw and so does the floating exchange rate system. For instance, if a country suffers from economic instability due to various reasons such as political issues, a floating exchange rate system will certainly discourage investment due to the high risk of suffering from inflationary disaster or sudden slump in exchange rate.
Another form of exchange rate is known as pegged exchange rate. This is a system where the value of the exchange rate is fixed by the government of a country and not the supply and demand of the market. This system is called pegged exchange rate because the value of a country’s currency is fixed to another country’s currency. As a result, the value of the pegged currency will not fluctuate unlike the floating currency. The working principle behind this system is slightly complicated where the government of a country will fixed the exchange rate of their currency and when there is a demand for a certain currency resulting a rise in the exchange rate, the government will have to release enough of that currency into the market in order to meet that demand. However, there is a fatal flaw in this system where if the pegged exchange rate is not controlled properly, panics may arise within the country and as a result of that, people will be rushing to exchange their money into a more stable currency. When that happens, the sudden overflow of that country’s currency into the market will decrease the value of their exchange rate and in the end, their currency will be worthless. Due to this reason, only those under-developed or developing countries will practice this method as a form to control the inflation rate.
However, the truth is, most of the countries do not fully practice the floating exchange rate or the pegged exchange rate method in reality. Instead, they use a hybrid system known as floating peg. Floating peg is the combination of the two main systems where one country will normally fixed their exchange rate to the US Dollars and after that, they will constantly review their peg rate in order to stay in line with the actual market value.
The Foreign exchange market, or commonly known as FOREX, is the largest and most prolific financial market because each day, more than 1 trillion worth of currency exchange takes place between investors, speculators and countries. From this, we can deduce that the actual mechanism behind the world of foreign exchange is far more complicated than what we may already know, and that, the information mentioned earlier is just the tip of an iceberg
Thursday, September 3, 2009
USD/JPY Pattern in Q3-Q4
The USD/JPY exchange rate could be expected to end the fourth quarter on a higher note than it did in the third quarter, consistent with the pattern seen in the 1996-2002 period (see charts). The exceptions to this Q3-Q4 pattern were 1998 and 2002 due to the following: Q4 1998: The 15% drop in Oct 1998 was triggered by massive selling of dollar-yen contracts by speculators unwinding their yen-carry trade positions after having initially sold yen to buy dollars and place funds in higher yielding US short-term securities. The exit (or unwinding) out of US assets was precipitated by: 1) investors worried about an incipient dollar decline eroding the value of their dollar based assets; 2) hedge funds selling their dollar assets to finance their deteriorating commitments in Asian equities and currencies. These two unusual forces exasperated the stampede, and accelerated the plunge in USDJPY, thus contributing to the pairs decline in Q4. Q4 2002: The USDJPY slide in October and part of November 2002 was the main catalyst to the pair’s negative performance in Q4 of 2002. The declines were primarily caused by markets’ dumping of the dollar amid increased certainty that the US would wage war against on Iraq, despite UN disapproval. That led to increased risk averseness, prompting risk capital to flee the US into Japan, which is distanced by geopolitical risks and enhanced by a hefty current account surplus. The fall in USD/JPY during Q4 is especially augmented by the blitz of foreign net purchases of Japanese stocks, which has entered a record 25-week run, amounting to 6.7 trillion yen ($60.4 billion) as Japanese institutions repatriate their foreign holdings in August and September for balance sheet/window-dressing purposes ahead of the end of the mid fiscal year on September 30. As institutional players begin to acquire dollar-denominated assets in the second half of the fiscal year beginning in October, USD/JPY is pushed higher into the end of the calendar year.

A Note on BoJ Intervention: Japanese authorities confirmed they intervened through the Federal Reserve Bank of NY in selling yen for dollars. The Fed’s acceptance to intervene does NOT imply the Fed is making any significant shifts in its dollar practices. The Fed only acted as an agent for the Bank of Japan, enabling it to weaken its currency and thwart excessive movements, which is permissible under the International Monetary Fund Law. Thus, it is one thing for the Fed to help out the Bank of Japan to weaken the yen against the dollar. It is another thing for the Fed to initiate the intervention effort and conduct “outright” intervention to strengthen the US dollar. REMINDER: The Fed would not want to strengthen the value of the dollar, especially when it is attempting to keep a lid on long yields. The BoJ's concerted intervention is likely to occur again especially ahead of Wednesday's (New York evening) tankan sentiment survey expected to show the best improvement in sentiment amid Japanese manufacturers in 3 years. The 10-year Treasury yield hits a 2-1/2 month low at 3.96%, falling below BELOW German 10-year yields (currently at 4.04%), which is accelerating the dollar’s decline against the European currencies. -Sep 30, 2003
Forexnews.com: Charts Package
Cash: Potent weapon for US troops in Afghan war zone
Matos was solemn as he pulled out 125,000 Afghanis — the equivalent of $2,500 and a huge amount by local standards — from a small metallic chest and handed the money to Abdul-Hamid. The farmer was smiling. ‘How about you top that with another 25,000’ Afghanis, Abdul-Hamid said, ‘so we reach a round figure?
Thirty-five Taliban killed in Afghan operation
SC returns petition against Musharraf
Why Musharraf’s trial is almost impossible
Musharraf’s trial never opposed, says Gilani
Prisoners’ rights
Gilgit-Baltistan
Gilani hopeful of PPP-PML consensus on Musharraf
CIA should keep an eye on Dr Khan, says Cheney
Nepal villagers on climate change frontline
Steps against droughts, floods under discussion in Geneva
PCB, ICC end 2011 World Cup hosting dispute
Militants set on fire two schools in Lower Dir
Suicide bomber kills 16 police cadets in Swat
British prime minister visits Afghanistan
Annual Rendez-vous with Japanese Repatriation
Annual Rendez-vous with Japanese Repatriation

Also in the same week, Japanese dealings in both foreign stocks and bonds showed net purchases falling to 15.2 billion yen, their lowest level since mid June. Japanese investors’ unloading of foreign stocks did not reduce their attraction from foreign bonds due to falling yields in US and other bonds, offering the potential for capital appreciation.


Global Equities in Tandem

* Fed raised rates 6 times for a total of 250 bps (Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Aug, Nov) ** The Peso Crisis and the Uprising in Chiapas *** Capital Exodus from Mexico heightened triggered overall loss of confidence in Emerging Markets. This was compounded by the collapse of Barings Bank GDP growth in industrialized nations: 1992= 2.1%, 1993= 1.4%, 1994= 3.3%, 1995=2.7%
1994-1996 TRANSITIONS
Broadening global recovery, US bail-out of Mexico, and the US entry into the "New Economy" paradigm all led to improved global market sentiment, which brought markets more in line.
GDP growth in industrialized nations: 1995= 2.7%, 1996= 3.2%
1997-2000 UNIFORMITY
As world economies begin to sustain their recoveries and cross-border protfolio flows accelerate, global stock markets move in tandem, making global diversification harder to achieve, simply based on geographical plays.

GDP growth in industrialized nations: 1997= 3.4%, 1998= 2.4%, 1999= 3.2% 2000 Forecast = 4.2% Asia: Asian turmoil reverberates in global markets, one week after Hong Kong's stock market sufferred its biggest drop ever, losing nearly 25% in 4 days on uncertainty regarding the HKDollar. Russia: Russia gets partial debt moratorium on foreign debt. Trading in Russian Rouble is suspended after Russian Gvt. Abandons setting a a floor value for the currency of 7.13 to the dollar, implementing a new floor of 9.5 to the dollar. Brazil: Despite $41 bln IMF loan package to Brazil in Nov, the Lat Am nation devalues its currency after Head of regional State refuses to repay State debt. January Tech Sell-off: Tech stocks get a beating on overvaluation worries, exacerbated by investors' unloading of stocks after New year to avoid capital gains tax.
About I.F

Intellectual Frontier Group Inc. (I.F) was created in 2005 with the goal of catering to the needs of the individual investor with risk capital to seek out excess returns in traditional and non-traditional investments. I.F was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and comprise of a unique team of seasoned Wall Street professionals with over 100 years of combined experience in trading, banking and other investment disciplines.
I.F will capitalize on an array of strategies to seek out opportunities in the financial markets and business opportunities to maximize investors' returns. Our team of experienced financial professionals manages risk effectively to produce consistent and attractive returns relative to the market. We are dedicated to identifying innovative opportunities to help create value and reach the investment goals of our clients. Our investment philosophy employs objective and systematic methods to maximize returns while simultaneously reducing risk. By leveraging the experience and knowledge of our team, we continually optimize our portfolio strategies with new ideas.
